Verily, It Boreth Me to Tears
It’s time for a literary poll. Illiterates need not participate.
Proposed: The classic novel Ivanhoe by Sir Walter Scott is quite possibly the most boring book ever written, English language or otherwise. Discussion is now open.
This topic has been a bone of contention between Stacey and I for most of the 20 years of our marriage. My wife is what you would call a bibliophile. From the day she was old enough to read, she has never willingly gone a day without reading several pages of something, preferably one of the classics. In high school, she never had to worry about the required reading lists because she had already read everything on them. She knows which Star Trek episodes are ripoffs of which Shakespeare plays. She reads the Brontë sisters (all of them) for fun.
I therefore consider her to be something of a casual authority on English literature. This makes it even harder for me to believe that she would call Ivanhoe “romantic and exciting.” It’s like calling distilled water “refreshing.”
As for me? I wouldn’t recognize a literary reference if it came up and bit me on Od’s bodkin. While I consider myself a well-read fellow, most of my recreational reading is centered on authors who are still alive, if for no other reason so I can harass them in email if I don’t like the ending. I have read quite a few of the classics, and I thoroughly enjoyed exactly two of them: The Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas, and Grendel by John Gardner. (I’m sure a psychologist could have a field day with this information). The rest of my exposure to the classics has been at the point of a teacher’s grading pencil. To this day, the name “John Steinbeck” is enough to send me scurrying for the safety of the Mack Bolan section of the bookstore.
Please understand that I am not a total rube. I enjoy good Shakespeare, and I can even recite my fair share of Polonius proverbs. However, Shakespeare was meant to be performed, not read. One can only take so many repetitions of the word “exeunt” before turning to the comic book version. I have similar problems with classical “adventure” books. An adventure story should dip and soar like an eagle on the wind, yet so many of these “adventures” get bogged down in descriptions of names, places, and heraldry devices. Which brings us back to Ivanhoe.
I have attempted a complete read-through of Ivanhoe no less than seven times in my life. I have yet to make it past the halfway point, which proves that my survival instinct is well intact. I fear that an attempt to push for the third act would see me waking up in the intensive care ward.
I know there’s a great story buried in there somewhere. How do I know this? Why, like any good American, I saw the movie. Two versions, in fact — the classic 1952 film by Richard Thorpe, and the surprisingly good television miniseries from 1982, which starred Olivia Hussey and a bunch of other people not nearly as stunningly attractive as she was. The movies had it all — action, suspense, intrigue, romance, and John Rys-Davies on a horse (he was a lot lighter back then).
Obviously, the screenwriters must have taken some liberties with the text. I’ve looked (seven times) and if all that adventure stuff is really there, it’s so mired in narrative, background, and historical context that it would even slow the metabolism of Robin Williams. My wife hears me say these things and thinks I’m a complete Philistine. Hey, at least they were born too early to be assigned Ivanhoe in their Humanities classes.
However, never let it be said that I’m not willing to learn something new. I have decided, therefore, to attempt yet another reading of that fine, fine piece of literature known as Ivanhoe. I’ll even start it right here, in front of my loyal readers, so you can be witnesses to my resolve.
Okay, here goes. Ivanhoe, page one. “In that pleasant district of merry England which is watered by the river Don, there extended in ancient times a large forest, covering the greater part of the beautiful hills and valleys which lie between Sheffield and the pleasant town of Doncaster. The remains of this extensive wood are still to be seen at the noble seats of Wentworth, of Warncliffe Park, and atta boysa uphna nagle grep asr uzza gmr humma hum hmm mph mumsz mmm…”
ZZZZzzzzzz.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

No. You are wrong. The most boring book ever written is “The Hobbit.” I have tried six times to read it, and my brain has nearly fallen out of my head on each occasion before I reached page 20.
Wow — talk about your polar opposites. I read The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings trilogy about once every year or two. All except for the poetry, which I tend to skim. “For over the misty mountains cold, to dungeons deep and caverns old, yada yada yada, yeah, get on with it…”
Now, if we’re talking The Silmarillion, I’m with you all the way. That thing reads like a Greek history.
Send queries to Pax Vobiscum…
Author Jasper Fforde has been polling visitors to his Web site, and they pronounce Moby Dick the most boring classic. Ivanhoe was tenth, which I expect Joe Goodwin to dispute…….
First Ivanhoe, now you’re all down on The Hobbit, The Silmarillion, and Moby Dick?! Either I’m the last person on Earth who appreciates timeless literature, or I’m more incrediby boring than I ever imagined. Next you’ll be telling me you believe Anna Karenina is a snoozer.
(Okay, okay, I’ll give you the Silmarillion. I only know of one other person who ever actually finished the whole thing, and I’m the only one I know who’s read it multiple times.)
Anna Karenina? Didn’t she do “99 Luftballons?”
Interesting how us humans need to lable art works that we don’t care for as “boring”, “poorly written” or just plain “bad”. If we like the work then we proclaim it a work to be “brilliant”, “mesmorizing” and we insult those who don’t see the obvious value that has been presented befor us(they in turn, insult us for liking the work).
For an enlightened society, we have a long way to go.
But that doesn’t explain “The Dukes of Hazzard”.
I happen to have read that some of your readers liked the “Dukes”. I would have liked it if it had been “The Dukes of Hazzard In Outer Space”. But that is my taste.
I have been reading “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance-An Inquiry Into Values” by Robert M. Pirsig for the last week or so. I read it 20 years ago and wore my copy out(paper back). So I got a hard back copy and I love this book. But it is not romantic nor is it Sci-Fi. It has no Hobbits or Lions or even Wardrobes. It wasn’t written 300 years ago, just 32 years ago. But I highly recomend it as it offers the reader to look at his own self, and let’s admit it, introspection is not a popular discipline these days.
I read that book many, many moons ago. In fact, it was so long ago that I’m sure if I re-read it now, I would swear on a stack o’ holy books that it wasn’t the same book. Certain books have a way of speaking to you in different ways during the different phases of your life, and a lesson learned at age 20 is not the same lesson when heard at age 40.
Kinda like the Bible, eh?
“ALL scripture is God breathed and is useful,,,” I believe that anything that speaks to you in a profound way and continues to do so is scripture. But, I ride a bicycle to work most every day and therefore I am a loon.
I did make it through ‘Ivanhoe’ years ago, but damn-all do I remember of it. I made it through ‘The Hobbit’ with no problem, but got about a third of the way into ‘Fellowship of the Ring’, put it down and never went back. Couldn’t force myself to.